4.6 Article

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms based genetic risk score in the prediction of pancreatic cancer risk

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 22, Pages 3076-3086

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i22.3076

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer; Single nucleotide polymorphisms; Genetic risk score; Chinese population; Genome-wide association study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Disease-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based genetic risk score (GRS) has been proven to provide independent inherited risk other than family history in multiple cancer types. AIM To evaluate the potential of GRS in the prediction of pancreatic cancer risk. METHODS In this case-control study (254 cases and 1200 controls), we aimed to evaluate the association between GRS and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) risk in the Chinese population. The GRS was calculated based on the genotype information of 18 PDAC-related SNPs for each study subject (personal genotyping information of the SNPs) and was weighted by external odd ratios (ORs). RESULTS GRS was significantly different in cases and controls (1.96 +/- 3.84 in PDACsvs1.09 +/- 0.94 in controls,P< 0.0001). Logistic regression revealed GRS to be associated with PDAC risk [OR = 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.34,P< 0.0001]. GRS remained significantly associated with PDAC (OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.06-1.74,P= 0.015) after adjusting for age and sex. Further analysis revealed an association of increased risk for PDAC with higher GRS. Compared with low GRS (< 1.0), subjects with high GRS (2.0) were 99% more likely to have PDAC (OR: 1.99, 95%CI: 1.30-3.04,P= 0.002). Participants with intermediate GRS (1.0-1.9) were 39% more likely to have PDAC (OR: 1.39, 95%CI: 1.03-1.84,P= 0.031). A positive trend was observed (Ptrend = 0.0006). CONCLUSION GRS based on PDAC-associated SNPs could provide independent information on PDAC risk and may be used to predict a high risk PDAC population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available