4.3 Article

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab in Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Multi-center, Open-label, Phase IIIb Study

Journal

CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
Volume 38, Issue 9, Pages 2058-2070

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.010

Keywords

durability; exacerbations; mepolizumab; severe eosinophilic asthma; safety

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) [MEA115661]
  2. GSK
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Sanofi
  5. Genentech
  6. NHLBI
  7. Teva
  8. Novartis
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim
  10. Esteve
  11. Almirall
  12. Centocor
  13. Chiesi
  14. Schering-Plough
  15. Aix-Marseille University
  16. Janssen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma often experience recurrent asthma exacerbations despite intensive inhaled corticosteroid therapy. In 2 previous double-blind studies (MENSA [NCT0169 1521] and SIRIUS [NCT01691508]), treatment with intravenous or subcutaneous mepolizumab was associated with significantly reduced annualized exacerbation rates and oral corticosteroid (OCS) requirements compared with placebo. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Methods: COSMOS was a 52-week, open-label extension study in patients who received mepolizumab or placebo in MENSA or SIRIUS. Patients received subcutaneous mepolizumab regardless of prior treatment allocation and continued to receive appropriate standard-of-care asthma therapy throughout. The primary objective was to assess the long-term safety of mepolizumab; end points included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Efficacy assessments included the annualized exacerbation rate and durability of response (defined as the exacerbation rate and OCS dose reduction when combined with MENSA and SIRIUS data, respectively). Findings: In total, 558 (86%; previous mepolizumab: 358; previous placebo: 200) and 94 (14%; previous mepolizumab: 58, previous placebo: 36) patients experienced on-treatment AEs and SAEs, respectively. No fatal AEs were reported. Totals of 13 (2%) and 29 (4%) patients experienced systemic and local site reactions, respectively. There were no reports of mepolizumab-related anaphylaxis. Mepolizumab treatment was shown to exert a durable response, with patients who previously received mepolizumab in MENSA or SIRIUS maintaining reductions in exacerbation rate and OCS dosing throughout COSMOS. Patients who previously received placebo in MENSA or SIRIUS demonstrated improvements in these end points following treatment with mepolizumab in COSMOS. Implications: These data demonstrate a favorable safety profile of mepolizumab and indicate a durable and stable effect over time, supporting long-term treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available