4.4 Article

Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate community responses to drying in chalk streams

Journal

WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 229-241

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/wej.12621

Keywords

biomonitoring; ecological status assessment; intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES); macroinvertebrate; temporary river; temporary stream; Water Framework Directive; winterbourne stream

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study on the invertebrate communities of the Candover Brook chalk stream revealed that while temporary stream channels have lower aquatic taxa richness compared to perennial reaches, the total biodiversity benefits from contributions from both aquatic and terrestrial species. It is recommended that research and monitoring should consider both aquatic and terrestrial communities in order to characterize the biodiversity and ecological quality of temporary streams.
Temporary streams are dynamic ecosystems that shift between wet and dry states and include the 'winterbourne' chalk streams of south England. Our understanding of temporary stream biodiversity is biased, with most research to date exploring aquatic invertebrate communities in benthic sediments during flowing phases. We surveyed the invertebrate communities of the Candover Brook chalk stream, comparing aquatic (benthic, hyporheic) and terrestrial communities in reaches with different flow permanence regimes. We used kick and Bou-Rouch sampling methods to collect aquatic invertebrates, and compared the terrestrial communities characterised by pitfall traps and ground searches and in different seasons. Although aquatic taxa richness was lower in temporary compared to perennial reaches, the total biodiversity of temporary stream channels was enhanced by contributions from both aquatic and terrestrial species, including several of conservation interest. We recommend that both aquatic and terrestrial communities should be considered in research and monitoring to characterise the biodiversity and ecological quality of temporary streams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available