4.5 Article

Impact of the National Perinatal Hepatitis B Prevention Programme in the Republic of Korea: A retrospective registry-based cohort study

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 38, Issue 34, Pages 5532-5540

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.044

Keywords

Hepatitis B vaccine; Mother-to-child transmission; Hepatitis B; Immunisation programme; Impact; Immunoprophylaxis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Hepatitis B is a major preventable cause of morbidity and mortality from chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the performance and outcomes of the Korean Perinatal Hepatitis B Prevention Programme (PHBPP) and to investigate the impact of the current post-exposure immunoprophylaxis protocol. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed based on electronic data registry of infants born to hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected mothers between July 2002 and 2013. Results: During the study period, 159,983 Korean infants were registered with the PHBPP, with an overall programme coverage of 92.8%. Despite receiving timely post-exposure immunoprophylaxis, 8.6% of infants born to mothers aged <25 years and hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg)-positive, and 0.7% of infants born to mothers aged >= 25 years and HBeAg-negative were infected. An estimated 14,123 infants were directly protected from perinatal HBV transmission by the PHBPP during the 11.5-year period, at a cost of 1157 US dollars per case averted. The incidence of paediatric hepatocellular carcinoma declined dramatically during the period. Conclusions: A substantial number of infants have been prevented from hepatitis B since the PHBPP was launched in the Republic of Korea. Continued efforts to promote the programme, an integrated approach to maximising its coverage, a risk-stratified strategy, and innovations in logistics could further reduce perinatal HBV transmission. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available