4.4 Article

Consistency of trial reporting between ClinicalTrials.gov and corresponding publications: one decade after FDAAA

Journal

TRIALS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04603-9

Keywords

FDA Amendments Act; Clinical trial reporting; Result reporting; Accurate reporting

Funding

  1. Harvard Global Health Institute Cordeiro Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA) required that information for certain clinical trials, such as details about study design features and endpoints, as well as results, be publicly reported in ClinicalTrials.gov. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of phase III trials with primary results published between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, in high-impact journals and found 74% contained at least one discrepancy between results reported in ClinicalTrials.gov and the corresponding publication. Our findings underscore the necessity for monitoring of clinical trial information and result reporting between sources; a checklist may provide a systemized procedure for investigators and editors to monitor accurate reporting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available