4.7 Article

Single-path service network design problem with resource constraints

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101945

Keywords

Transportation; Service network design; Single-path constraints; Resource constraints; Column generation heuristic

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [71672126, 71532015]
  2. Shanghai Education Development Foundation
  3. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [18SG23]
  4. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [PolyU 155077/18B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study a new service network design problem, where the number of available resources at each terminal is limited, and each commodity is delivered along a single path that prevents flow partition. Such a single-path constraint is motivated by currently emerging requirements in bulk transportation, express delivery, hazardous material transportation, etc. We model this problem with two mathematical formulations, i.e., node-arc and arc-cycle formulations, both of which lead to large-scale and computationally difficult mixed-integer programs. The node-arc formulation faces a significant computation burden. To that end, we develop a two-stage mathematical integer programming based heuristic for the arc-cycle formulation to produce high-quality solutions. In the first stage, a column generation procedure is executed to generate an optimal solution for the linear relaxation of the restricted master problem, and in the second stage, four heuristic strategies are designed to efficiently generate integer feasible solutions for the original problem. We conduct extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of our proposed approach by comparing it with a commercial solver (CPLEX). We also examine the performance differences among four heuristic strategies, in terms of the frequency of finding integer feasible solutions and the quality of solutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available