4.1 Article

Application of urine antigen assay to evaluate outcomes of praziquantel treatment and reinfection in opisthorchiasis in northeast Thailand

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/traa057

Keywords

faecal examination; follow-up; Opisthorchis viverrini; praziquantel; reinfection; urine antigen assay

Funding

  1. Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP)
  2. Fluke-Free Thailand, National Research Council of Thailand, Invitation Research Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University [IN62145]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A urine antigen assay was applied to evaluate chemotherapeutic outcomes and reinfection patterns of opisthorchiasis in Thailand. Methods: We used a prospective study design by following opisthorchiasis subjects at baseline and posttreatment using a urine antigen assay and faecal examination by the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT). Results: The antigen of Opisthorchis viverrini in urine diminished within 4 weeks after praziquantel treatment. Concurrent faecal examinations by FECT showed that faecal eggs were negative at 4 weeks after treatment. In a subsequent study, reinfection rates and intensity patterns of 0. viverrini were evaluated at 48 weeks after praziquantel treatment. Within a group of subjects with curative treatment (n=137), 16.8% became reinfected according to FECT and 27.7% according to the urine antigen assay (p<0.05). There were significant correlations in intensity of infection between pretreatment and at 48 weeks post-treatment in both faecal egg counts and antigen levels in urine. Conclusions: The results suggested that in addition to screening, the urine antigen assay is an efficient tool for monitoring outcomes of drug treatment and reinfection in opisthorchiasis. Due to the ease of urine sample collection and handling, the urine assay becomes an alternative method to faecal examination for diagnosis and monitoring of opisthorchiasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available