4.6 Article

Marked Decrease Over Time in Conversion Surgery After Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Journal

THYROID
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 217-223

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2020.0319

Keywords

papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; active surveillance; conversion surgery; lymph node metastasis; tumor size; tumor volume-doubling rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Active surveillance for low-risk papillary microcarcinoma (PMC) is generally safe, but some patients may undergo conversion surgery due to disease progression, patient preference, physician preference, or other reasons. A study found that patients in the second-half group were less likely to undergo conversion surgery than those in the first-half group, regardless of the reason for surgery. This may be attributed to the accumulation of favorable outcomes with active surveillance, leading to increased confidence among physicians and trust among patients.
Background:Active surveillance for low-risk papillary microcarcinoma (PMC) of the thyroid is an accepted and safe management strategy. However, some patients undergo conversion surgery after the initiation of active surveillance for various reasons. We investigated the reasons for conversion surgery and whether and how they changed over time. Methods:We enrolled 2288 patients with PMC who underwent active surveillance. Of these, 162 (7.1%) underwent conversion surgery >12 months after initiating active surveillance due to disease progression (57 patients), patient preference (43 patients), physician preference (31 patients), other associated thyroid or parathyroid diseases (24 patients), and other reasons (7 patients). We analyzed cumulative conversion rates not only in the whole cohort but also in the first three major subsets based on the reasons for surgery. We also divided our whole cohort into two groups based on the period of active surveillance commencement: the first-half group (February 2005-November 2011; 561 patients) and the second-half group (December 2011-June 2017; 1727 patients). Results:The criteria for PMC progression did not differ between the first- and second-half groups. The proportion of female patients in the physician preference group was significantly higher than that in the disease progression and the patient preference groups. Tumor size at surgery was larger, and tumor volume-doubling rate was higher in the disease progression group than in the other two groups. Patients in the second-half group were significantly less likely to undergo conversion surgery than those in the first-half group. Furthermore, conversion surgery rates in the second-half group were significantly lower than those in the first-half group in the patient preference, physician preference, and disease progression groups. Conclusions:Patients with PMC in the second-half group were significantly less likely to undergo conversion surgery than those in the first-half group regardless of the reason. This is probably because data accumulation of favorable outcomes with active surveillance significantly contributed to physicians' confidence and patients' trust and understanding of this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available