4.7 Article

Screen-printed anion-exchange solid-phase extraction: A new strategy for point-of-care determination of angiotensin receptor blockers

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121518

Keywords

Ion exchange solid phase extraction; Screen-printed electrode; Nylon 6/polyaniline; Nanofibers; Angiotensin II receptor antagonists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A miniaturized system of anion exchange solid phase extraction based on a screen-printed electrode was developed for extraction and quantitative determination of anionic analytes. The system was evaluated using angiotensin receptor antagonists as model compounds, showing good recovery rates in human blood plasma samples.
A miniaturized system of anion exchange solid phase extraction (SPE) based on a screen-printed electrode was developed as a point of care (POC) device for extraction and quantitative determination of anionic analytes. Nylon 6/polyaniline nanofibers were fabricated by electrospinning and in-situ oxidative polymerization techniques coated on a screen-printed working electrode and characterized by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods. The effects of essential parameters such as desorption conditions, pH of the sample solution, adsorption voltage, adsorption time, and salt concentration on the performance of the method were investigated. To evaluate the performance of the system, angiotensin.. receptor antagonists, including valsartan, losartan, and irbesartan, were selected as model compounds and analyzed by HPLC/UV after extraction. The limits of detection and quantification were ranging between 0.4 and 0.9 mu g L-1 and 1.3-3.0 mu g L-1, respectively. The linear dynamic range for Losartan, Irbesartan, and Valsartan was 2-400, 4-1000, and 2-400 mu g L-1, respectively, with R-2 > 0.991. Finally, the method was applied for the determination of ARA-IIs in human blood plasma samples, and relative recoveries in the range of 89.0-107.8% with relative standard deviation (RSDs (<= 8.9% were obtained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available