4.3 Article

The clinical value of exhaled nitric oxide in patients with lung cancer

Journal

CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 23-30

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/crj.12471

Keywords

exhaled nitric oxide (eNO); lung cancer; airway inflammation; pulmonary function

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province [814330]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction and ObjectivesTo investigate the clinical value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in lung cancer patients. Methods A total of 172 healthy control subjects and 164 patients with histopathologically confirmed lung cancer were enrolled in this study. The FeNO measurements and pulmonary function tests were conducted in the Chinese PLA General Hospital. The recorded data included FeNO, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, the FEV1 (% predicted), the demographic characteristics, the presence of complications and the smoking status. Results The patients with lung cancer had a significantly higher level of eNO than the healthy control subjects (33.8515.63 ppb, n=163; 16.83 +/- 4.17 ppb, n=172; P<0.01). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for eNO predicting airway inflammation in lung cancer subjects and healthy control subjects was 0.932 (95% confidence interval: 0.904-0.961). Inthe lung cancer group, the eNO levels in the squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, small-cell lung cancer and lung carcinoid tumor groups were significantly different (P<0.01). Lung cancer patients with a predicted FEV1% value <80% had a higher level of eNO than the patients with a predicted FEV1% value 80%. Conclusions The eNO levels in patients with lung cancer were higher than the normal level, especially in the patients with squamous cell carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer. The differences in eNO among the lung cancer subtypes were statistically significant. Measuring eNO will be helpful in diagnosing airway inflammation in lung cancer and in the classification of lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available