4.6 Article

The physics of representation

Journal

SYNTHESE
Volume 199, Issue 1-2, Pages 1307-1325

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-020-02793-y

Keywords

Representation; Neural networks; Inductive bias

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of representation is widely and uncontroversially used in neuroscience, contrasting its highly controversial status in philosophy and cognitive science. The paper discusses the use of the term in neuroscience, particularly in characterizing representations empirically, and relates it to the field of machine learning, arguing that the success of artificial neural networks in certain tasks reflects inherent inductive biases similar to biological brains.
The concept of representation is used broadly and uncontroversially throughout neuroscience, in contrast to its highly controversial status within the philosophy of mind and cognitive science. In this paper I first discuss the way that the term is used within neuroscience, in particular describing the strategies by which representations are characterized empirically. I then relate the concept of representation within neuroscience to one that has developed within the field of machine learning (in particular through recent work in deep learning or representation learning). I argue that the recent success of artificial neural networks on certain tasks such as visual object recognition reflects the degree to which those systems (like biological brains) exhibit inherent inductive biases that reflect the structure of the physical world. I further argue that any system that is going to behave intelligently in the world must contain representations that reflect the structure of the world; otherwise, the system must perform unconstrained function approximation which is destined to fail due to the curse of dimensionality, in which the number of possible states of the world grows exponentially with the number of dimensions in the space of possible inputs. An analysis of these concepts in light of philosophical debates regarding the ontological status of representations suggests that the representations identified within both biological and artificial neural networks qualify as legitimate representations in the philosophical sense.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available