4.5 Article

Effects of serelaxin in acute heart failure patients with renal impairment: results from RELAX-AHF

Journal

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages 727-737

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-016-0979-8

Keywords

Serelaxin; Acute heart failure; Renal function; Renal impairment; Number needed to treat

Funding

  1. Alere
  2. Bayer
  3. Cardio3Biosciences
  4. Celladon
  5. Ceva
  6. European Committee
  7. Dutch Heart Foundation
  8. Novartis
  9. Servier
  10. Torrent
  11. Vifor
  12. Amgen
  13. Corthera
  14. Cardio3 Bioscience
  15. Cytokinetics
  16. Merck
  17. Takeda
  18. Teva
  19. Trevena
  20. Otsuka
  21. Roche Diagnostics
  22. NHLBI
  23. European Union
  24. Abbott
  25. PDL BioPharma
  26. Novartis Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serelaxin showed beneficial effects on clinical outcome and trajectories of renal markers in patients with acute heart failure. We aimed to study the interaction between renal function and the treatment effect of serelaxin. In the current post hoc analysis of the RELAX-AHF trial, we included all patients with available estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline (n = 1132). Renal impairment was defined as an eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) estimated by creatinine. 817 (72.2 %) patients had a baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). In placebo-treated patients, baseline renal impairment was related to a higher 180 day cardiovascular (HR 3.12, 95 % CI 1.33-7.30) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.81, 95 % CI 1.34-5.89). However, in serelaxin-treated patients, the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was less pronounced (HR 1.19, 95 % CI 0.54 -2.64; p for interaction = 0.106, and HR 1.15 95 % CI 0.56-2.34 respectively; p for interaction = 0.088). In patients with renal impairment, treatment with serelaxin resulted in a more pronounced all-cause mortality reduction (HR 0.53, 95 % CI 0.34-0.83), compared with patients without renal impairment (HR 1.30, 95 % CI 0.51-3.29). Renal dysfunction was associated with higher cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in placebo-treated patients, but not in serelaxin-treated patients. The observed reduction in (cardiovascular) mortality in RELAX-AHF was more pronounced in patients with renal dysfunction. These observations need to be confirmed in the ongoing RELAX-AHF-2 trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available