4.5 Article

The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes

Journal

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 972-983

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269215515604672

Keywords

Accidental falls; fall prevention intervention; nursing homes; feasibility studies; randomized controlled trial

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Research for Patient Benefit grant funding stream [PB-PG-1010-23053]
  2. Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands (CLAHRC EM) [P0511172]
  3. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-1010-23053] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  4. National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-1010-23053] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention. Design: Two-centre, cluster feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. Setting: Purposive sample of six diverse old age/learning disability, long stay care homes in Nottinghamshire, UK. Subjects: Residents aged over 50years, who had fallen at least once in the past year, not bed-bound, hoist-dependent or terminally ill. Interventions: Intervention homes (n=3) received Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention training and support. Control homes (n=3) received usual care. Outcomes: Recruitment, attrition, baseline and six-month outcome completion, contamination and intervention fidelity, compliance, tolerability, acceptance and impact. Results: A total of 81 of 145 (56%) care homes expressed participatory interest. Six of 22 letter respondent homes (27%) participated. The expected resident recruitment target was achieved by 76% (52/68). Ten (19%) residents did not complete follow-up (seven died, three moved). In intervention homes 36/114 (32%) staff attended training. Two of three (75%) care homes received protocol compliant training. Staff valued the training, but advised greater management involvement to improve intervention implementation. Fall risks were assessed, actioned and recorded in care records. Of 115 recorded falls, 533/570 (93%) of details were complete. Six-month resident fall rates were 1.9 and 4.0 per year for intervention and control homes, respectively. Conclusions: The Guide to Action Care Home is implementable under trial conditions. Recruitment and follow-up rates indicate that a definitive trial can be completed. Falls (primary outcome) can be ascertained reliably from care records.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available