4.3 Article

Hippocampal NG2+pericytes in chronically stressed rats and depressed patients: a quantitative study

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10253890.2020.1781083

Keywords

Animal model; stress; depression; pericyte; Neural; glial antigen 2

Funding

  1. Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF-5053-00103]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2018-02564]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2018-02564] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress exposure leads to an increase in hippocampal pericyte population, while IL-1 beta can significantly stimulate the proliferation of pericytes.
Objective:The suggested link between major depression disorder (MDD) and blood-brain barrier (BBB) alterations supports an impact on the neurovascular unit in this disease condition. Here we investigate how pericytes, a major component in the neurovascular unit, respond to stress, stress hormones, proinflammatory cytokine and depression. Method:Hippocampal sections of chronic unpredictable stressed (CMS) rats, MDD patients and respective controls were immuno-stained against NG2, where the number of NG2+ pericytes in the molecular layer was counted. Proliferation of cultured pericytes after treatment with cortisol and IL-1 beta was analyzed using radioactive-labeled thymidine. Findings:The number of NG2+ pericytes was significantly higher in CMS animals than controls. Higher number of NG2+ pericytes was also detected in MDD patients, but the increase did not reach significance. IL-1 beta, but not cortisol, induced a significant increase in proliferation of cultured pericytes. Conclusion:Our results indicate that exposure to stressful conditions affects the hippocampal pericyte population. These findings add to our knowledge about the impact of stress on the neurovascular unit, which might be relevant for understanding the alterations in BBB found in MDD patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available