4.6 Article

Probabilistic solar forecasting benchmarks on a standardized dataset at Folsom, California

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages 628-639

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.020

Keywords

Probabilistic solar forecasting; Standardized dataset; NWP; Satellite; Sky camera

Categories

Funding

  1. project Probabilistic Forecasting for Battery Management - Swedish Energy Agency
  2. project Development and evaluation of forecasting models for solar power and electricity use over space and time - Swedish Energy Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present paper echos a recent data article, A comprehensive dataset for the accelerated development and benchmarking of solar forecasting methods [J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 11, 036102 (2019)]. The carefully composed dataset by Pedro, Larson, and Coimbra (PLC) presents a rare opportunity for solar forecasters to develop transparent and reproducible algorithms that can bring incremental contributions to the field. In their original paper, data from four different sources, namely, ground-based measurements, sky-camera images, satellite-imagery features, and numerical weather prediction outputs, were arranged in a machine-learning-ready setup. Subsequently, several benchmarks for deterministic forecasting were set forth, for intra-hour, intra-day, and day-ahead scenarios. Nonetheless, a weather forecast is intrinsically five-dimensional, spanning space, time, and probability. In this regard, five reference methods for probabilistic forecasting: (1) complete-history persistence ensemble, (2) Markov-chain mixture model, (3) ordinary least squares, (4) analog ensemble, and (5) quantile regression, are applied to the PLC dataset. The R code provided in this paper follows the structure of the original Python code precisely, facilitating those solar forecasters who are not familiar with Python but have a statistics background.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available