4.4 Article

Piecewise strength model for three types of ultra-soft fine-grained soils

Journal

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 778-790

Publisher

JAPANESE GEOTECHNICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2020.04.010

Keywords

Ultra-soft soils; Undrained shear strength; Shear strain rates; Combination test method; Shear thinning behavior; Piecewise model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51879036]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC0309203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Problems of ultra-soft soils, with the characteristics of high water content and very low strength, have been gradually distinguished from those of typical soft soils in recent years to address the new requirements of ocean geotechnical engineering, such as the improvement of dredged fills and hazard assessment of submarine landslides. Focusing on effects of high water content and different shear strain rates on the undrained shear strength of ultra-soft soils, a series of experimental investigations were conducted, using a combination test method, on three types of fine-grained soils with different grain size distributions: kaolin soil, Bohai Sea soil, and South China Sea soil. After preparing ultra-soft soil samples with high water content two to three times the liquid limit, the relationship between the strength and the water content of the soil was analyzed. Then, the changing trend of strength with shear strain rates in a broader range of 0.001-20 s(-1) was discussed. Based on the test results and theory of shear thinning behavior, a piecewise model for the ultra-soft soil strength was proposed. The piecewise strength model can adequately reflect the strength characteristics of ultra-soft soils at different shear strain rate ranges, and the parameters in the model can be measured, or simply estimated. (C) 2020 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Geotechnical Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available