4.8 Article

Cationic Covalent-Organic Framework as Efficient Redox Motor for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Journal

SMALL
Volume 16, Issue 34, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202002932

Keywords

anion exchange; cationic covalent-organic framework; lithium-sulfur batteries; polysulfide anchoring

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [21825106]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21671175]
  3. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [164100510005]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in Universities of Henan Province [19IRTSTHN022]
  5. Zhengzhou University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The shuttle effect of soluble lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) leads to the rapid decay of sulfur cathode, severely hindering the practical applications of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. To this point, a covalent-organic framework (COF) with proper cationic sites, which can be utilized as the cathode host of high-performance Li-S batteries, is reported. The chemical sulfur anchoring within micropores effectively suppresses the dissolution of LiPSs into the electrolyte. During the discharge step, the cationic sites can accept electrons from anode and deliver them to polysulfides to facilitate the polysulfides' disintegration. Meanwhile, the cationic sites can receive electrons from polysulfides and then send them to the anode during the charge process, which promotes the polysulfides oxidation. Thus, both experiments and computational modeling show that the cationic COF can effectively inhibit the shuttle effect of LiPSs and improve the batteries' performances. Compared with electrically neutral COFs, the cationic COF-based batteries show much better cycling stability even at high current density, for instance, a high specific capacity of 468 mA h g(-1)is retained after 300 cycles at a current density of 4.0 C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available