4.0 Article

A new method for self-paced peak performance testing on a treadmill

Journal

CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 108-117

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12390

Keywords

feedback control; heart rate; oxygen uptake; self-paced testing; treadmill; ventilatory threshold

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeSelf-paced maximal testing methods may be able to exploit central mediation of function-limiting fatigue and therefore have potential to generate more valid estimates of peak oxygen uptake. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a new method for self-paced peak performance testing on treadmills and to compare peak and submaximal performance outcomes with those obtained using a non-self-paced (computer-paced') method employing predetermined speed and slope profiles. MethodsThe proposed self-paced method is based upon automatic subject positioning using feedback control together with an exercise intensity which is driven by a predetermined, individualized work-rate ramp. ResultsPeak oxygen uptake was not significantly different for the computer-paced (CP) versus self-paced (SP) protocols: 438048 versus 434 +/- 046mlmin(-1), P=042. Likewise, there were no significant differences in the other peak and submaximal cardiopulmonary parameters, viz. peak heart rate, peak respiratory exchange ratio and the first and second ventilatory thresholds. Ramp duration for CP was longer than for SP: 4945 +/- 711 versus 3713 +/- 860s, P=000072. Concomitantly, the peak rate of work done against gravity was higher for CP: 2648 +/- 408 versus 2038 +/- 534W, P=00021. ConclusionsThe self-paced approach was found to be feasible for estimation of the principal performance outcomes: the method was technically implementable, it was acceptable to the subjects and it showed good responsiveness. Further investigation of the self-paced method, with adjustment of the target ramp-phase duration or modification of the work-rate calculation equations, is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available