4.6 Article

Deep Learning for Feature Extraction in Remote Sensing: A Case-Study of Aerial Scene Classification

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 20, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s20143906

Keywords

remote sensing; convolutional neural network (CNN); feature extraction; feature fusion

Funding

  1. COST Action g2net (A network for Gravitational Waves, Geophysics, and Machine Learning) [CA17137]
  2. Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scene classification relying on images is essential in many systems and applications related to remote sensing. The scientific interest in scene classification from remotely collected images is increasing, and many datasets and algorithms are being developed. The introduction of convolutional neural networks (CNN) and other deep learning techniques contributed to vast improvements in the accuracy of image scene classification in such systems. To classify the scene from areal images, we used a two-stream deep architecture. We performed the first part of the classification, the feature extraction, using pre-trained CNN that extracts deep features of aerial images from different network layers: the average pooling layer or some of the previous convolutional layers. Next, we applied feature concatenation on extracted features from various neural networks, after dimensionality reduction was performed on enormous feature vectors. We experimented extensively with different CNN architectures, to get optimal results. Finally, we used the Support Vector Machine (SVM) for the classification of the concatenated features. The competitiveness of the examined technique was evaluated on two real-world datasets: UC Merced and WHU-RS. The obtained classification accuracies demonstrate that the considered method has competitive results compared to other cutting-edge techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available