4.6 Article

Can medical imaging identify the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastases?

Journal

SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 33-41

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.07.002

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. 'Kom op tegen Kanker' grant [GZA/2018/11458/1, UZ Gent/2018/11458/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of liver metastases can predict patient outcomes and resistance to systemic treatment, but their full potential has not been realized. Medical imaging studies show promise in identifying HGPs, but further research is needed to confirm their accuracy and utility in treatment planning.
The histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of liver metastases of colorectal cancer and of several other tumor types predict outcome of patients in multiple studies. The HGPs of liver metastases have a prognostic but also a predictive value with one of the growth patterns, the replacement growth pattern, related to resistance to systemic treatment. Given that the HGP can only be assessed in a reliable manner when a surgical resection of the metastasis has been performed, this biomarker cannot be exploited to the full. For example, HGPs can at this moment, not be used to decide whether patients with liver metastatic breast or colorectal cancer will benefit or not from locoregional treatment, such as surgery or radiotherapy, and from pen-operative systemic treatment. In this review we highlight studies that suggest that the HGPs of liver metastases can be identified by medical imaging. Although still to be confirmed by a prospective multicenter approach, some studies indeed achieve a high accuracy in predicting the HGPs by applying radiomic algorithms on CT- or MR-images of liver metastases. This is an important step towards a treatment planning of patients with liver metastatic cancer that takes into account the biology and the progression kinetics of the metastases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available