4.6 Article

Facies model of a sedimentary record for a Pantanal-like inland wetland

Journal

SEDIMENTOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 7, Pages 3683-3717

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sed.12766

Keywords

Inland wetlands; limnogeology; Pantanal facies model; wetland sedimentology; Yecua Formation

Categories

Funding

  1. GeoAmbiente Rangers Group
  2. National Scientific Council of Argentina (CONICET)
  3. Pluspetrol S.A.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite recent advances in wetland studies, ancient wetland deposits are still not well documented, and their facies characteristics are poorly registered. Sedimentary facies and sequence stratigraphic analysis of the Miocene Yecua Formation (Chaco foreland basin, Central Andes, Bolivia) and their comparison to Pantanal-like modern wetlands provide an insight into their variability, suggesting a facies model for large inland wetlands that developed in a tropical-subtropical climate. Sedimentological features show that clastic, chemical and biological processes in these environments lead to distinguishable lithofacies variations. Six architectural elements are described: (i) muddy sublittoral (FA1); (ii) mixed siliciclastic-carbonate shoreface (FA2); (iii) sand-flat (FA3) and (iv) mud-flat (FA4) deposits; (iv) floodplain (FA5); and (vi) simple channel deposits (FA6). The succession is composed of shallowing-upward parasequences with different facies characteristics caused by climatically-driven changes of the water level over three orders of magnitude and cyclicity. These cyclic changes reflect a climatic control on the sedimentation. A palaeoclimatic interpretation suggests a generally warm, humid climate with marked rainfall regime changes. The aim of this article is to use this dataset to improve the understanding of depositional elements, lithologies and stratigraphy in tropical-subtropical large inland wetlands. The proposed criteria will help in recognizing inland wetland deposits in other sedimentary basins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available