4.7 Review

A review of the application of adsorbents for land fill leachate treatment: Focus on magnetic adsorption

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 731, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138863

Keywords

Leachate adsorption; Magnetized sorbents; Humic Acid; Waste management; Nanomaterials; Nanosorbents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Landfill leachate is a significant environmental threat due to the complexity and variety of its pollutants. There are various physical, chemical, and biological treatment methods proposed for leachate treatment. Adsorption with conventional adsorbents such as activated carbon is a process which has been widely employed with relative success. Magnetic adsorbents are a special type of adsorbents with favorable stability, high adsorption capacities, and excellent recycling and reuse capabilities when compared to conventional sorbents. Research regarding the synthesis and use of magnetic adsorbents has been growing at a rapid pace, exhibiting > 8-fold increase in publications in the decade of 2010 to 2020. In the current study, both conventional and magnetic adsorbents for landfill leachate treatment have been comprehensively reviewed and discussed. The application of magnetic adsorbents for landfill leachate treatment is relatively new, with numerous avenues of research open to study. Although the production of magnetic adsorbents is significantly more expensive than conventional adsorbents, when taking into consideration all life cycle costs, they are much more competitive than it initially appears. If environmental impacts are of concern, research should shift towards the use of greener chemicals and processes for magnetic adsorbent synthesis, because preliminary analysis of the current synthesis processes shows a much higher environmental impact compared to conventional adsorbents, in particular in terms of global warming potential and energy use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available