4.7 Article

Field measurement and modelling of chlorotoluron and flufenacet persistence in unamended and amended soils

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 725, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138374

Keywords

Field dissipation; Herbicides; Soil; Spent mushroom substrate; Green compost; MACRO model

Funding

  1. MINECO/FEDER UE [AGL2015-69485-R]
  2. MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE [RTI2018-101587-J-I00]
  3. MINECO [IJCI-2014-19538]
  4. European Social Fund (ESF)
  5. Consejeria de Educacion (Junta de Castilla y Leon Government)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dissipation and persistence of two cereals herbicides, chlorotoluron and flufenacet, were studied in a field experiment including three replicated plots of unamended soil (S), soil amended with spent mushroom substrate (S+ SMS), and soil amended with green compost (S+ GC), during the winter wheat cultivation campaign. The SMS and GC organic residues were applied to the soil at rates of 140 or 85 t residue ha(-1), and herbicides were sprayed as Erturon (R) and Herold (R) formulations for chlorotoluron and flufenacet, respectively. Concentrations of both herbicides and of their metabolites were regularly measured in the three soil treatments (0-10 cm) from 0 to 339 days. The dissipation kinetics fitted well the single first order (SFO) model, except that of chlorotoluron that fitted the first ordermulti-compartment (FOMC) model better in the unamended soil. The dissipation rates of herbicides were lower in amended than in unamended soils. The results also showed that the DT50 of chlorotoluron (66.2-88.0 days) and flufenacet (117-145 days) under field conditions were higher than those previously obtained at laboratory scale highlighting the importance of the changing environmental conditions on the dissipation process. Similarly, the formation of chlorotoluron and flufenacet metabolites under field conditions was different from that previously observed in the laboratory. The performance of the MACRO pesticide fate model, parameterized with laboratory data, was then tested against field data. There was a very good agreement between measured and simulated chlorotoluron residue levels in the three soil treatments, while the ability of the model to reproduce the dissipation of flufenacet was good in the unamended soil and very good in S + SMS and S + GC soils. MACRO might be used to estimate the remaining amounts of herbicides in amended soils from degradation data previously obtained at laboratory scale. This would help to manage herbicide doses in different environmental conditions to preserve the sustainability of agricultural systems. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available