4.7 Review

A-DA'D-A non-fullerene acceptors for high-performance organic solar cells

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY
Volume 63, Issue 10, Pages 1352-1366

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-020-9799-4

Keywords

organic solar cells; A-DA'D-A non-fullerene acceptors; electron-deficient core; photovoltaic properties

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875286]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0206600]
  3. Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hunan Province [2017JJ1029]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the world-record power conversion efficiency of 15.7% was achieved for organic solar cells (OSCs) in 2019, the newly developed non-fullerene acceptor (NFA) Y6 with an A-DA ' D-A structure (A denotes an electron-accepting moiety, D denotes an electron-donating moiety) has attracted increasing attention. Subsequently, many new A-DA ' D-A NFAs have been designed and synthesized, and the A-DA ' D-A NFAs have played a significant role in the development of high-performance non-fullerene organic solar cells (NF-OSCs). Compared with the classical A-D-A-type acceptors, A-DA ' D-A NFAs contain an electron-deficient core (such as benzothiadiazole (BT), benzotriazole (BTA), quinoxaline (Qx), or their derivatives) in the ladder-type fused rings to fine-tune the energy levels, broaden light absorption and achieve higher electron mobility of the NFAs. This review emphasizes the recent progress on these emerging A-DA ' D-A (including Y-series) NFAs. The synthetic methods of DA ' D-fused rings are introduced. The relationships between the chemical structure of the A-DA ' D-A NFAs and the photovoltaic performance of the corresponding OSCs are summarized and discussed. Finally, issues and prospects for further improving photovoltaic performance of the OSCs are also proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available