4.8 Article

DNA capture by a CRISPR-Cas9-guided adenine base editor

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 369, Issue 6503, Pages 566-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abb1390

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centers for Excellence in Genomic Science of the National Institutes of Health [RM1HG009490]
  2. Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (OD) [U01AI142817-02]
  3. William M. Keck Foundation
  4. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  5. Paul Allen Frontiers Group
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  7. National Science Foundation [1817593]
  8. NHMRC [1175568]
  9. American Australian Association
  10. Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group
  11. NIH [R01GM061115, T32GM113770, U01 AI142756, RM1 HG009490, R01 EB022376, R35 GM118062]
  12. St. Jude Collaborative Research Consortium
  13. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  14. HHMI
  15. Harvard Chemical Biology Training Grant [T32 GM095450]
  16. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1175568] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CRISPR-Cas-guided base editors convert A center dot T to G center dot C, or C center dot G to T center dot A, in cellular DNA for precision genome editing. To understand the molecular basis for DNA adenosine deamination by adenine base editors (ABEs), we determined a 3.2-angstrom resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of ABE8e in a substrate-bound state in which the deaminase domain engages DNA exposed within the CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex. Kinetic and structural data suggest that ABE8e catalyzes DNA deamination up to similar to 1100-fold faster than earlier ABEs because of mutations that stabilize DNA substrates in a constrained, transfer RNA-like conformation. Furthermore, ABE8e's accelerated DNA deamination suggests a previously unobserved transient DNA melting that may occur during double-stranded DNA surveillance by CRISPR-Cas9. These results explain ABE8e-mediated base-editing outcomes and inform the future design of base editors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available