4.4 Article

Influence of neoatherosclerosis on prognosis and treatment response in patients with in-stent restenosis

Journal

REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages 427-435

Publisher

EDICIONES DOYMA S A
DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2020.03.004

Keywords

Neoatherosclerosis; Restenosis; Optical coherence tomography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of neoatherosclerosis on the prognosis and treatment response in patients with in-stent restenosis. The results showed that in patients treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon or everolimus-eluting stents, neoatherosclerosis did not seem to affect acute and long-term outcomes.
Introduction and objectives: Neoatherosclerosis is one of the causes of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Our objective was to evaluate the influence of neoatherosclerosis on prognosis and treatment response in patients with ISR. Methods: This is a pooled analysis of the optical coherence tomography (OCT)-substudies of 2 multicenter, randomized clinical trials, RIBS IV and V, comparing treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon vs everolimus-eluting stent in patients with ISR. OCT evaluation was performed at baseline and at 6 to 9 months. Neoatherosclerosis was defined in baseline OCT as neointima with calcified or lipid content. We evaluated the angiographic and OCT results at 6 to 9 months and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 3 years of follow-up in patients with and without neoatherosclerosis treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon or everolimus-eluting stents. Results: Sixty-four patients underwent OCT at the time of the index procedure. Neoatherosclerosis was documented in 23 (36%) lesions. Angiographic follow-up at 6 to 9 months showed no differences in restenosis [5 (24%) vs 6 (15%) P=.49], minimum lumen diameter (1.79 +/- 0.7 vs 1.94 +/- 0.6 mm; P=.41) or late loss (0.33 +/- 0.7 vs 0.15 +/- 0.5; P=.34) in patients with and without neoatherosclerosis, respectively. Follow-up OCT confirmed the absence of differences in quantitative parameters and the characteristics of tissue coverage between the 2 groups. At 3 years of follow-up, the major adverse cardiovascular events rate was 3 (13%) vs 5 (12%) in the neoatherosclerosis and nonneoatherosclerosis groups (HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.22-3.93; P=.93). Conclusions: In this limited study population, OCT-defined neoatherosclerosis did not seem to influence acute and long-term outcomes in patients randomized to paclitaxel-coated balloon or everolimuseluting stents for ISR. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available