4.6 Review

Organoid technology in female reproductive biomedicine

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00621-z

Keywords

Organoids; Reproductive organs; Reproductive medicine; Organoid-on-a-chip

Funding

  1. National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD) [987770]
  2. Royan Institute [96000189]
  3. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences [12466]
  4. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [96004094]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent developments in organoid technology are revolutionizing our knowledge about the biology, physiology, and function of various organs. Female reproductive biology and medicine also benefit from this technology. Organoids recapitulate features of different reproductive organs including the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries, as well as trophoblasts. The genetic stability of organoids and long-lasting commitment to their tissue of origin during long-term culture makes them attractive substitutes for animal and in vitro models. Despite current limitations, organoids offer a promising platform to address fundamental questions regarding the reproductive system's physiology and pathology. They provide a human source to harness stem cells for regenerative medicine, heal damaged epithelia in specific diseases, and study biological processes in healthy and pathological conditions. The combination of male and female reproductive organoids with other technologies, such as microfluidics technology, would enable scientists to create a multi-organoid-on-a-chip platform for the next step to human-on-a-chip platforms for clinical applications, drug discovery, and toxicology studies. The present review discusses recent advances in producing organoid models of reproductive organs and highlights their applications, as well as technical challenges and future directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available