4.7 Article

China's renewable energy trade potential in the Belt-and-Road countries: A gravity model analysis

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 1025-1035

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.134

Keywords

China's belt road initiative; Renewable energy; Trade potential; Gravity model; Stepwise regression

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71991482, 71773119]
  2. National Social Science Foundation of China (NSSFC) [17ZDA085]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for National Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [CUG170101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The trade ties between China and the Belt-and-Road Countries have been developing rapidly since the Belt-and-Road Initiative was proposed in 2013. Understanding the potential of renewable energy trade products in this region is of great significance for the renewable energy industry. By adopting the gravity model and data of 81 products from 2007 to 2017 across 66 countries, empirical evidence was examined of China's renewable energy product trade potential in the Belt and Road countries. The results indicated that: (1) The gross domestic product (GDP) of the Belt and Road countries and the total energy consumption of two trading parties were the main factors affecting China's export of renewable energy products; (2) Among the 65 countries along the Belt and Road, China had great potentials for exporting renewable energy products in 26 countries, and most of them were in the CIS, Central and Eastern Europe, West Asia, South Asia and Central Asia; and (3) China's trade potentials for renewable energy products had increased year by year during the study period in the 16 countries in Central and Eastern Europe, and experienced ups and downs in other regions. In recent years, China's trade potential in the CIS countries had rebounded significantly. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available