4.7 Article

Effect of fermentation type regulation using alkaline addition on two-phase anaerobic digestion of food waste at different organic load rates

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages 385-393

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.051

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Fermentation; Food waste; Methane; Sodium hydroxyl

Funding

  1. Shenzhen Science and Technology Project [JCYJ20170817161931586]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFC1902900]
  3. Development and Reform Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (urban water recycling and environment safety program)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In two-phase anaerobic digestion (TPAD) of food waste, alkaline addition is commonly used to alter fermentation types aiming to improve the subsequent methanogenesis. However, alkaline usage could also cause the accumulation of salt and inhibit methanogens. To discover the opposite effect, a series of continuous TPAD experiments with automatic pH control were conducted at different organic load rates (OLRs). The results indicated that pH regulation was not always effective for TPAD. At the OLR of 1.9 g/(L.d), mixed acid fermentation at pH 6.0 and lactic acid fermentation at pH 4.5 were achieved with the average NaOH dose of 1.69 and 2.45 g/(L.d), respectively, and the subsequent methane production increased to 460 and 482 ml/g in comparison to 380 ml/g in single-phase anaerobic digestion (SPAD). At the OLR of 2.4 g/(L.d), the Na+ concentration in methanogenic phase increased more than 3.5 g/L, resulting in the deterioration of methane production. At the OLRs higher than 3.2 g/(L.d), pH control cannot be applied to TPAD, and SPAD suffered from excessive acidification. Thus, TPAD without pH control became the only choice, but its methane yield was only 397 ml/g, implying new methods should be considered to improve TPAD. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available