4.7 Article

Reliability analysis of composite insulators subject to multiple dependent competing failure processes with shock duration and shock damage self-recovery

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 204, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107166

Keywords

Composite insulators; Multiple dependent failure processes; Shock duration; Self-recovery mechanism; Shock damage model; Reliability model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71672006, 71971009, JSZJ2017601B006, JSZL2019601B001]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YWF-20-BJ-J-501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent developments in composite insulators highlight the demand for reliability analysis, and similar to most engineering products, composite insulators experience multiple dependent competing failure processes. However, two distinct characteristics of the failure processes of composite insulators-sustained shock and self-recovery mechanism-have not received attention in previous studies, resulting in inaccurate assessments of their reliability. In view of these problems, a novel shock damage model is first proposed to accurately reflect the impact of harmful random shocks on the degradation processes of composite insulators, considering both the shock magnitude and the shock duration. Subsequently, a detailed self-recovery process considering both the recovery level and the recovery time is developed to reflect the self-recovery mechanism. Furthermore, an improved practical reliability model with an analytical expression is proposed for composite insulators subject to multiple dependent competing failure processes considering degradation processes, random shocks, and self-recovery processes. Finally, a numerical study of composite insulators is conducted to illustrate the implementation of the proposed model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available