4.7 Article

TiO2-coated LiNi0.9Co0.08Al0.02O2 cathode materials with enhanced cycle performance for Li-ion batteries

Journal

RARE METALS
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 1719-1726

Publisher

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-020-01483-5

Keywords

Li-ion batteries; Cathode materials; TiO2; LiNi0.9Co0.08Al0.02O2; Enhanced cycle performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51701173]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, spherical LiNi0.9Co0.08Al0.02O2 powders with 0.4 wt% TiO2 coating layer were prepared by impregnation-hydrolysis method. The TiO2 coating layer effectively improved the cycling performance and stability of the electrode at a high discharge ratio.
Ni-rich cathode material is one of the most promising materials for Li-ion batteries in electric vehicles. However, fading capacity, poor cyclic stability and high pH value are still major challenges, which suppress its practical application. In this study, spherical LiNi0.9Co0.08Al0.02O2 powders with 0.4 wt% TiO2 coating layer were prepared by impregnation-hydrolysis method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) results show that TiO2 is uniformly coated on the surface of LiNi0.9Co0.08Al0.02O2 particle and slightly embedded into LiNi0.9Co0.08Al0.02O2 particles. After 100 cycles at 2.0C, 0.4 wt% TiO2-coated LiNi0.9Co0.08Al0.02O2 electrode delivers much higher discharge capacity retention (77.0%) than the pristine LiNi0.9Co0.08Al0.02O2 electrode (63.3%). The excellent cycling performance of 0.4 wt% TiO2 -coated LiNi0.9Co0.08Al0.02O2 electrode at a high discharge ratio is due to a TiO2 coating layer which can effectively reduce the direct contact between cathode material and electrolyte, suppress the oxidation of electrolyte, improve electrical conductivity of the electrode and increase the stability of the structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available