4.5 Article

Pragmatic approach to manage new oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing dental extractions: a prospective case-control study

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 2183-2188

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-2010-1

Keywords

Tooth extraction; Anticoagulants; New oral anticoagulants (NOACs); Interruption; Bleeding

Funding

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to validate a standardized pragmatic approach to manage new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients who undergo dental extractions. This prospective case-control study in patients undergoing dental extraction included 26 patients (mean age 76 years, 57% male) treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban and 26 matched controls. Regardless of timing of extraction, drug regimen, or renal function, patients were instructed to skip only the dose on the morning of the procedure. A procedural bleeding score was recorded and early and delayed bleeding was assessed at day 1 and day 7. Bleeding events were compared with a prospectively matched control group not taking any antithrombotic drug. There was no difference in the procedural bleeding score or in early bleeding events (5 in both groups). However, delayed bleeding occurred more frequently in anticoagulated compared to non-anticoagulated patients (7 versus none, p = 0.01). Skipping the morning dose of NOACs avoids excess bleeding during and early after the procedure. However, anticoagulated patients had an increased risk of delayed bleedings. Further study is needed to determine the optimal post-procedural management. This is the first prospective study for the management of patients on NOACs undergoing dental extraction. Our pragmatic approach, omitting only a single morning dose, can guide clinical practice. Both patients and physicians should be aware of the increased delayed bleeding risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available