4.7 Article

Refined study on lithium ion battery combustion in open space and a combustion chamber

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 133-146

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.03.037

Keywords

Lithium ion battery safety; Jet flame; Flame height; Combustion chamber; Heat release rate

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674228, 51976209]
  2. FundamentalResearch Funds for the Central Universities [WK2320000038]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [Y201768]
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [749512]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [749512] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More refined combustion tests on 18,650-type lithium ion batteries (LIBs) are conducted both in open space (OS test) and a combustion chamber (CC test). High-speed camera is used to capture the fast rupture and ignition of LIB. In OS tests, jet-flame height increases with the state of charge (SOC), ranging from 0.095 to 0.217 m for 70-100% SOC cell. The ejecting velocity of fragments reaches 30 m s(-1). In CC tests, the electrolyte solvent and flammable gas products are ignited by the ignition rods leading to deflagration and more complete combustion than that in open space. The predicted mass loss ratio of LIB is 14.36% agreeing with experiments. As SOC increases, more lithium metal is available in anode to react with electrolyte to generate more flammable gases. Higher SOC leads to higher specific combustion heat of the mixed gas products, thus increases the severity of thermal runaway and combustion. The total heat release of a LIB fire can be predicted by adding the contribution of all organics' combustion heats based on thermodynamic data. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available