4.5 Article

Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1113-1118

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12925

Keywords

CAD; CAM; cone beam computed tomography; guided implant surgery

Funding

  1. ITI scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesGuided implant surgery (GIS) is performed with drilling guides that are produced on the virtual tooth model using CAD/CAM technology. The prerequisite for this workflow is the alignment of patients cone beam computed tomography CBCT and surface scan (registration). Dental restorations may cause deteriorating imaging artifacts in CBCT data, which in turn can have an impact on the registration process. The influence of the user and the preprocessing of data and of image artifacts on the registration accuracy were examined. Material and MethodsCBCT data and intraoral surface scans of 36 patients were used for virtual implant planning in coDiagnostiX (Dentalwings, Montreal, Canada). CBCT data were reconstructed to a three-dimensional anatomical model with the default settings provided by the software and also manually by four different examiners. Subsequently, the CBCT and intraoral surface models were registered by each examiner with the help of anatomical landmarks. Patients' data were subdivided into four groups (A-D) according to the number of metallic restorations: A=0-2 restorations, B=3-5 restorations, C=6-8 restorations and D>8 restorations. After registration, the distances between CBCT and dental surface models were measured. Linear regression models were used to assess the influence of the segmentation, the examiner and to the number of restorations (P<0.05). ResultsThe deviations between surface scan and CBCT models accounted to 0.54mm (mean). The mean deviations were 0.69mm (max. 24.8mm) and 0.4mm (max. 9.1mm) for default and manual segmentation, respectively. Mean deviations of 0.36mm (Group A), 0.43mm (Group B), 0.67mm (Group C) and 1.01mm (Group D) were recorded. The segmentation (P=0.000), the user (P=0.0052) and the number of restorations (P=0.0337) had a significant influence on the registration accuracy. ConclusionsThe deviation between CBCT and surface scan model resulting from inaccurate registration is transferred to the surgical field and results in a deviation between the planned and actual implant position. The registration accuracy in commercial virtual implant planning software is significantly influenced by the preprocessing of imported data, by the user and by the number of restorations resulting in clinically non-acceptable deviations encoded in drilling guides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available