4.6 Article

Life under quartz: Hypolithic mosses in the Mojave Desert

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235928

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. California State University, Los Angeles, Department of Biological Sciences Faculty-Student Achievement Fund
  2. University of California, Berkeley, Department of Integrative Biology Graduate Research Fund
  3. NIH-NIGMS Minority Biomedical Research Support-Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement program [GM61331]
  4. NSF Dimensions of Biodiversity award [DEB-1638996, DEB-1638956]
  5. Berkeley Research Impact Initiative (BRII) - UC Berkeley Library

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several species of dryland cyanobacteria are known to occur as hypoliths under semi-translucent rocks. In the Mojave Desert, these organisms find refuge from intense solar radiation under milky quartz where moisture persists for a longer period of time than in adjacent soil surface habitat. Desert mosses, which are extremely desiccation-tolerant, can also occur in these hypolithic spaces, though little is known about this unique moss microhabitat and how species composition compares to that of adjacent soil surface communities. To address this question, we deployed microclimate dataloggers and collected moss samples from under and adjacent to 18 milky quartz rocks (quartz mean center thickness 26 +/- 15 mm) in a western high elevation Mojave Desert site. Light transmission through Mojave quartz rocks may be as low as 1.2%, and data from microclimate loggers deployed for five months support the hypothesis that quartz provides thermal buffering and higher relative humidity compared to the soil surface. Of the 53 samples collected from hypolith and surface microhabitats, 68% wereSyntrichia caninervis, the dominant bryophyte of the Mojave Desert biological soil crust.Tortula inermisaccounted for 28% of the samples and 4% wereBryum argenteum. In a comparison of moss community composition, we found thatS.caninerviswas more likely to be on the soil surface, though it was abundant in both microhabitats, whileT.inermiswas more restricted to hypoliths, perhaps due to protection from temperature extremes. In our study site, the differences between hypolithic and surface microhabitats enable niche partitioning betweenT.inermisandS.caninervis, enhancing alpha diversity. This work points to the need to thoroughly consider microhabitats when assessing bryophyte species diversity and modelling species distributions. This focus is particularly important in extreme environments, where mosses may find refuge from the prevailing macroclimatic conditions in microhabitats such as hypoliths.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available