4.6 Article

Screening archaeological bone for palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic studies

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235146

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Onassis Foundation [F ZL 047-1/2015-2016]
  2. Leventis Foundation
  3. Greek Archaeological Committee UK (GACUK)
  4. Leverhulme Trust [PLP-2012-116]
  5. DNRF [DNRF 128]
  6. EU Social Fund
  7. Greek national funds research program ARISTEIA II
  8. Villum Foundation (Young Investigator Programme) [10120]
  9. Sino-Hellenic Academic Project, from the Key Research Institute of the Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation Center on the Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
  10. ERC [295729-CodeX]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recovery and analysis of ancient DNA and protein from archaeological bone is time-consuming and expensive to carry out, while it involves the partial or complete destruction of valuable or rare specimens. The fields of palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic research would benefit greatly from techniques that can assess the molecular quality prior to sampling. To be relevant, such screening methods should be effective, minimally-destructive, and rapid. This study reports results based on spectroscopic (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total reflectance [FTIR-ATR]; n = 266), palaeoproteomic (collagen content; n = 226), and palaeogenetic (endogenous DNA content; n = 88) techniques. We establish thresholds for three different FTIR indices, a) the infrared splitting factor [IRSF] that assesses relative changes in bioapatite crystals' size and homogeneity; b) the carbonate-to-phosphate [C/P] ratio as a relative measure of carbonate content in bioapatite crystals; and c) the amide-to-phosphate ratio [Am/P] for assessing the relative organic content preserved in bone. These thresholds are both extremely reliable and easy to apply for the successful and rapid distinction between well- and poorly-preserved specimens. This is a milestone for choosing appropriate samples prior to genomic and collagen analyses, with important implications for biomolecular archaeology and palaeontology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available