4.5 Article

Platelet removal by single-step centrifugation

Journal

PLATELETS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 440-443

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1779924

Keywords

Blood; blood platelets; centrifugation; extracellular vesicles; flow cytometry

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Domain Applied and Engineering Sciences (NWO-TTW) [VENI 13681]
  2. Perspectief CANCER [14198]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study developed a fast and simple single-step centrifugation protocol for producing high-quality platelet-free plasma for EV research. Compared to the traditional two-step protocol, the single-step protocol is faster, removes platelets effectively, and has a slightly higher plasma yield.
The study of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in plasma requires removal of cells including platelets. At present, a two-step centrifugation protocol is recommended and commonly used. A simpler protocol that is less operator dependent is likely to improve the quality of plasma samples collected for EV research. The objective of this study is to develop an easy, fast and clinically applicable centrifugation protocol to produce essentially platelet-free plasma with a high yield for EV research. We compared the two-step centrifugation protocol to a single-step protocol at 5,000 g for 20 minutes. The removal of platelets was computationally predicted and experimentally validated. Flow cytometry was used to detect residual platelets and platelet-derived (CD61+) EVs. The single-step protocol at 5,000 g (i) is less laborious and approximately ten minutes faster, (ii) removes platelets as effective as the two-step centrifugation protocol, and (iii) has a similar to 10% higher plasma yield, whereas (iv) the recovery of platelet-derived EVs is comparable. For future research on plasma EVs we recommend the newly developed, easy and fast single-step protocol for preparation of platelet-free plasma for research on plasma biomarkers including EVs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available