4.5 Article

Performance and safety of collagenated xenogeneic bone block for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation and staged implant placement. A monocenter, prospective single-arm clinical study

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 954-960

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12902

Keywords

alveolar ridge augmentation; clinical study; collagenated xenogeneic bone block (CXBB); histological analysis

Funding

  1. Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To assess the clinical safety and performance of collagenated xenogeneic bone block (CXBB) for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation and two-stage implant placement. Material & Methods: In ten patients exhibiting a single-tooth gap, the surgical procedure included the preparation of mucoperiosteal flaps, a rigid fixation of CXBB (Geistlich Bio-Graft((R))) using an osteosynthesis screw, and contour augmentation. After 24 weeks of submerged healing, the primary endpoint was defined as the final ridge width sufficient to place an adequately dimensioned titanium implant at the respective sites. Secondary outcomes included, for example, the gain in ridge width ( mm). Clinical parameters (e.g., bleeding on probing - BOP, probing depth - PD, mucosal recession - MR) were assessed immediately after the cementation of the crown and at the final visit. Results: At 24 weeks, implant placement could be achieved in 8 of 10 patients exhibiting a mean gain in ridge width (mean +/- SD) of 3.88 +/- 1.75 mm. Histological analysis has pointed to a homogeneous osseous organization of CXBB. The changes of mean BOP, PD, and MR values at the final visit amounted to 16.62 +/- 32.02%, 0.04 +/- 0.21 mm, and -0.04 +/- 0.12 mm, respectively. Conclusions: CXBB may be successfully used to support lateral alveolar ridge augmentation and two-stage implant placement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available