4.7 Article

Immunocytochemistry and Density Functional Theory evidence the competition of aluminum and calcium for pectin binding in Urochloa decumbens roots

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages 64-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.05.015

Keywords

Aluminum tolerance; Acidity tolerance; Cell wall; Monoclonal antibodies; Quantum physics principles

Categories

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  3. CAPES
  4. PPGBV of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Root growth is reduced in soils with low pH [H+] and abundant soluble aluminum [Al3+], which can be a consequence of the interaction between Al3+ and cell wall composition. The competition between Al3+ and Ca2+ toward binding to pectin molecules was evaluated in roots of Urochloa decumbens, an African grass highly adapted to acidic Al-rich soils. Variations in the composition and distribution of pectins can change the extensibility, rigidity, porosity, and adhesive properties of plant cell walls, which were tested in seedlings of U. decumbens exposed to pH 3.5, 4.5 and 5.8 and to 0, 80, 160 and 320 mu M of Al3+ for 80h. Root growth corroborated that U. decumbens is very tolerant to soil acidity, with effective reduction of root growth only at pH 3.5. Immunocytochemical approaches demonstrated variations in pectin composition induced both by Al3+ and by H+ in root tissues and zones. Based on the usual linkage between Ca2+ and pectins, Density Functional Theory (DFT) analyses indicated that Al3+ bound easier to pectins than Ca2+ did, leading to the formation of more Al3+-pectate complexes than Ca2+-pectate complexes, which resulted in higher rigidity of cell walls, and hampered cell extension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available