Radiographic and histological evaluation of deproteinized bovine bone mineral vs. deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in ridge preservation. A randomized controlled clinical trial

ObjectivesThe aims of this randomized clinical trial were to compare the dimensional changes and the histological composition after using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) or deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DBBM-C) and a collagen membrane in ridge preservation procedures. Material and methodsPatients who required an extraction and a subsequent implant-supported rehabilitation at a non-molar site were recruited. After extraction, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed and sites were randomly treated either with DBBM or DBBM-C plus a collagen membrane. At 5months, before implant placement, a second CBCT was performed and a biopsy of the area was obtained. A blinded investigator superimposed the CBCTs and performed measurements to determine bone volume changes between the two time points. Additionally, a histomorphometric analysis of the biopsies was performed in a blinded manner. ResultsEleven sites belonged to the DBBM group and eleven to the DBBM-C group. All together, a significant reduction in height and width was observed at 5months of healing, but no statistically significant differences were observed between the DBBM and the DBBM-C group. The histomorphometric analysis revealed a similar composition in terms of newly formed bone, connective tissue and residual graft particles in both groups. ConclusionsDeproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen showed a similar behaviour as DBBM not only in its capacity to minimize ridge contraction but also from a histological point of view. Thus, both graft materials seem to be suitable for ridge preservation procedures.