4.8 Article

The Rice Circadian Clock Regulates Tiller Growth and Panicle Development Through Strigolactone Signaling and Sugar Sensing

Journal

PLANT CELL
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 3124-3138

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.20.00289

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Research and Education Innovation Consortium
  2. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rice circadian clock integrates sugar signaling and regulates expression of strigolactone pathway genes to control tillering and panicle development. Circadian clocks regulate growth and development in plants and animals, but the role of circadian regulation in crop production is poorly understood. Rice (Oryza sativa) grain yield is largely determined by tillering, which is mediated by physiological and genetic factors. Here we report a regulatory loop that involves the circadian clock, sugar, and strigolactone (SL) pathway to regulate rice tiller-bud and panicle development. Rice CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (OsCCA1) positively regulates expression of TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 (OsTB1, also known as FC1), DWARF14 (D14), and IDEAL PLANT ARCHITECTURE1 (IPA1, also known as OsSPL14) to repress tiller-bud outgrowth. Downregulating and overexpressing OsCCA1 increases and reduces tiller numbers, respectively, whereas manipulating PSEUDORESPONSE REGULATOR1 (OsPPR1) expression results in the opposite effects. OsCCA1 also regulates IPA1 expression to mediate panicle and grain development. Genetic analyses using double mutants and overexpression in the mutants show that OsTB1, D14, and IPA1 act downstream of OsCCA1. Sugars repress OsCCA1 expression in roots and tiller buds to promote tiller-bud outgrowth. The circadian clock integrates sugar responses and the SL pathway to regulate tiller and panicle development, providing insights into improving plant architecture and yield in rice and other cereal crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available