4.4 Article

Functional Image-guided Radiotherapy Planning for Normal Lung Avoidance

Journal

CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 695-707

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.08.005

Keywords

CT ventilation; lung avoidance; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); radiation therapy planning; radiation-induced lung injury

Categories

Funding

  1. Sheffield Hospitals Charity
  2. Weston Park Hospital Charity
  3. University of Sheffield James Morrison Fund
  4. National Institute of Health Research
  5. British Heart Foundation [SP/14/6/31350] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/M008894/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NIHR-RP-R3-12-027] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MR/M008894/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For patients with lung cancer undergoing curative intent radiotherapy, functional lung imaging can be incorporated into treatment planning to modify the dose distribution within non-target volume lung by differentiation of lung regions that are functionally defective or viable. This concept of functional image-guided lung avoidance treatment planning has been investigated with several imaging modalities, primarily single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), but also hyperpolarised gas magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT)-based measures of lung biomechanics. Here, we review the application of each of these modalities, review practical issues of lung avoidance implementation, including image registration and the role of both ventilation and perfusion imaging, and provide guidelines for reporting of future lung avoidance planning studies. (C) 2016 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available