4.7 Review

Closing in on the origin of Galactic cosmic rays using multimessenger information

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.002

Keywords

Cosmic rays; Astrophysical neutrinos; High-energy astrophysics; Milky Way; Supernova Remnants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In cosmic ray physics extensive progress has been made in recent years, both concerning theory and observation. The vast details in direct, indirect and secondary detections on the one hand provide the basis for a detailed modeling of the signatures via cosmic-ray transport and interaction, paving the way for the identification of Galactic cosmic-ray sources. On the other hand, the large number of constraints from different channels of cosmic-ray observables challenges these models frequently. In this review, we will summarize the state-of-the art of the detection of cosmic rays and their secondaries, followed by a discussion what we can learn from coupling our knowledge of the cosmic-ray observables to the theory of cosmic-ray transport in the Galactic magnetic field. Finally, information from neutral secondaries will be added to draw a multimessenger-picture of the non-thermal sky, in which the hypothesis of supernova remnants as the dominant sources survives best. While this has been known since the 1930s, evidence for this scenario is steadily growing, with the first possible detection of hadronic signatures at GeV energies detected for three SNRs with Fermi. The existence of SNRs as PeVatrons, however, is not validated yet. The discussion of this and other open questions concerning the level of anisotropy, composition and spectral shape of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum is reviewed. Future perspectives of how to find the smoking cosmic-ray source gun concludes this review. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available