4.5 Article

Residual Solvents in Nanomedicine and Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems: a Case Study to Better Understand Processes

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-020-02877-x

Keywords

liposomes; nanoparticles; nanomedicine manufacturing; residual solvent; gas chromatography; quality control

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec Sante (FRQS) (EuroNanoMed III program)
  3. Fondation du CHU de Quebec
  4. Faculty of Pharmacy of Universite Laval
  5. Canadian Funds for Innovation (CFI)
  6. MITACS
  7. Fondation du CHU de Quebec-Desjardins
  8. FRQS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Complexities surrounding the manufacture and quality control of nanomedicines become increasingly apparent. This research article offers a case study to investigate how, at the laboratory scale, various stages of liposome and nanoparticle synthesis affect the amount of residual solvent found in the formulations. The objective is to bring insights on the reliability of each of these processes to provide final products which meet regulatory standards and facilitate identifying possible bottleneck early during the development process. Methods The residual solvent at various stages of preparation and purification was measured by headspace gas chromatography. Liposomes were prepared by two different methods with and without solvent. Polymer nanoparticles prepared via nanoprecipitation and purified by ultrafiltration were studied. The effects of purification by size exclusion chromatography and dialysis were also investigated. Results The complete removal of residual solvent requires processes which go beyond usual preparation methods. Conclusions This work might prove valuable as a reference for scientists of different fields to compare their own practices and streamline the translation of nanomedicines into efficacious and safe drug products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available