4.7 Review

Systematic review of the impact of HbA1c on outcomes following surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 308-316

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.03.007

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus; HbA1c; Surgery; Outcome; Complications

Funding

  1. European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & aims: Diabetes is a significant risk factor for surgical complications and also increases the prevalence of comorbidities, thereby increasing surgical risk. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the relationship between long-term preoperative glycemic control as measured by HbA1c and postoperative complications. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to source articles published between 1980 and 2014 pertinent to the review. Full-text articles were included if they met the pre-determined criteria as determined by two reviewers. Studies reporting the impact of preoperative HbA1c levels on postoperative outcomes in all disciplines of surgery were included. Results: Twenty studies, including a total of 19,514 patients with diabetes mellitus from a range of surgical specialties, were suitable for inclusion. Preoperative glycemic control did not have a bearing on 30-day mortality. There were no significant differences in the incidence of stroke, venous thromboembolic disease, hospital readmission and ITU length of stay based on glycemic control. The majority of studies suggested no link between preoperative HbA1c levels and acute kidney injury or need for postoperative dialysis, dysrhythmia, infection not related to the surgical site and total hospital length of stay. The literature was highly variable with regards to myocardial events, surgical site infection and reoperation rates. Conclusions: Elevated preoperative HbA1c was not definitively associated with increased postoperative morbidity or mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus. The studies included in this review were relatively heterogeneous, predominantly retrospective, and often contained small patient numbers, suggesting that good quality evidence is necessary. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available