4.4 Review

Novel imaging techniques for cystic fibrosis lung disease

Journal

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages S40-S54

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24931

Keywords

biomarkers; cystic fibrosis (CF); imaging

Funding

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [GORALS19Y5, NAREN19R0, WOODS19A0]
  2. National Institutes of Health [HL123299, HL131012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the latest developments in lung imaging modalities for CF patients, ranging from commonly used chest radiography and CT scans to emerging techniques like structural/functional proton and hyperpolarized gas MRI. These imaging tools offer new possibilities for early disease detection and monitoring treatment efficacy.
With an increasing number of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) receiving highly effective CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator protein) modulator therapy, particularly at a young age, there is an increasing need to identify imaging tools that can detect and regionally visualize mild CF lung disease and subtle changes in disease state. In this review, we discuss the latest developments in imaging modalities for both structural and functional imaging of the lung available to CF clinicians and researchers, from the widely available, clinically utilized imaging methods for assessing CF lung disease-chest radiography and computed tomography-to newer techniques poised to become the next phase of clinical tools-structural/functional proton and hyperpolarized gas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Finally, we provide a brief discussion of several newer lung imaging techniques that are currently available only in selected research settings, including chest tomosynthesis, and fluorinated gas MRI. We provide an update on the clinical and/or research status of each technique, with a focus on sensitivity, early disease detection, and possibilities for monitoring treatment efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available