4.5 Article

Imbalance-XGBoost: leveraging weighted and focal losses for binary label-imbalanced classification with XGBoost

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 190-197

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2020.05.035

Keywords

Imbalanced classification; XGBoost; Python package

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81872719, 81803337]
  2. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR201807090257]
  3. National Bureau of Statistics Foundation Project [2018LY79]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents Imbalance-XGBoost, a Python package that combines the powerful XGBoost software with weighted and focal losses to tackle binary label-imbalanced classification tasks. Though a small-scale program in terms of size, the package is, to the best of our knowledge, the first of its kind which provides an integrated implementation for the two loss functions on XGBoost and brings a general-purpose extension to XGBoost for label-imbalanced scenarios. In this paper, the design and usage of the package are discussed and illustrated with examples. Furthermore, as the first- and second-order derivatives of the loss functions are essential for the implementations, the algebraic derivation is discussed and it can be deemed as a separate contribution. The performances of the methods implemented in the package are extensively evaluated on Parkinson's disease classification dataset, and multiple competitive performances are presented with the ROC and Precision-Recall (PR) curves. To further assert the superiority of the methods, the performances on four other benchmark datasets from the UCI machine learning repository are additionally reported. Given the scalable nature of XGBoost, the package has great potentials to be broadly applied to real-life binary classification tasks, which are usually of large-scale and label-imbalanced. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available