Journal
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 61-67Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2020.07.042
Keywords
Traditional machine learning; Deep learning; Support vector machines; Convolutional neural networks
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper compares and analyzes traditional machine learning and deep learning image classification algorithms, finding that traditional machine learning performs better on small sample datasets, while deep learning has higher recognition accuracy on large sample datasets.
Image classification is a hot research topic in today's society and an important direction in the field of image processing research. SVM is a very powerful classification model in machine learning. CNN is a type of feedforward neural network that includes convolution calculation and has a deep structure. It is one of the representative algorithms of deep learning. Taking SVM and CNN as examples, this paper compares and analyzes the traditional machine learning and deep learning image classification algorithms. This study found that when using a large sample mnist dataset, the accuracy of SVM is 0.88 and the accuracy of CNN is 0.98; when using a small sample COREL1000 dataset, the accuracy of SVM is 0.86 and the accuracy of CNN is 0.83. The experimental results in this paper show that traditional machine learning has a better solution effect on small sample data sets, and deep learning framework has higher recognition accuracy on large sample data sets. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available