4.7 Article

A unified framework for efficient, effective, and fair resource allocation by food banks using an Approximate Dynamic Programming approach

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102300

Keywords

Approximate Dynamic Programming; food insecurity; Markov decision processes; resource allocation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a framework for optimizing the allocation of resources by food banks to address the impact of food insecurity and poor nutrition on health issues. Through a dynamic programming model and computational experiments, it is shown that this approach significantly improves total utility and the nutrition of the served population.
In response to growing evidence linking food insecurity and poor nutrition to an increased risk of chronic health problems, such as diabetes and malnutrition, food bank personnel and policy makers must proactively seek new policies and practices that combat food insecurity and ensure that food bank systems function equitably and efficiently. We develop a framework for optimizing resource allocation by food banks among the agencies they serve. Our framework explicitly considers measures of the effectiveness and efficiency of the resource allocation problem faced by food banks, and it implicitly considers an equity performance measure. We measure effectiveness based on the nutritional value of the allocation decisions, efficiency as the utility of the agencies served, and equity as fairness in the allocation of food among those agencies. Specifically, we develop a dynamic programming model in which the primary decision is how much of each product to allocate/distribute to each agency. To deal with the highdimensional state space in the dynamic program, we construct approximations to the value function that are parameterized by a small number of parameters. Computational experiments using real-world data obtained from a food bank in New York State, which serves about 19,0 0 0 individuals per week, are used to evaluate the performance of our approach. When compared against the policy currently in use, our algorithm demonstrated a 7.73% improvement in total utility. Furthermore, when compared against the offline model, where randomness is revealed upfront, the gap between our algorithm and the offline model was less than 9.50%. On the effectiveness side, our framework demonstrated a 3.0% improvement in the nutrition of the served population. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available