4.7 Article

Bond of epoxy-coated reinforcement to seawater coral aggregate concrete

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107350

Keywords

Bond properties; Epoxy-coated reinforcement; Seawater coral aggregate concrete; Bond-slip relation; Failure mode

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408346, 51978389]
  2. Systematic Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety [2019ZDK035]
  3. Opening Foundation of Shandong Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention [CDPM2019KF12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bond between epoxy-coated reinforcement (ECR) and seawater coral aggregate concrete (SCAC) were studied by using a series of pull-out tests. Five different parameters were considered in this test: types of concrete (SCAC and ordinary concrete (OC)) and reinforcement (ECR and ordinary reinforcement), the ratio of bond length to reinforcement diameter (3, 5 and 8), and concrete strength (C25 and C35) and thickness of concrete cover. The failure mode, bond-slip curve and strength of specimens were analyzed. Typical failure mode of pull-out specimen was splitting failure, while the failure surface of SCAC specimen was different from that of OC specimen. Test results indicated that the bond strength of specimen with SCAC was high compared to specimen using OC even under the similar concrete strength. Seawater coral aggregate concrete-ECR (SCAC-ECR) bond strength decreased with increasing bond length and decreasing concrete strength and thickness of concrete cover. The bond-slip curve of SCAC-ECR was similar to that of ordinary concrete (OC)-ordinary reinforcement (OR). However, SCAC and ECR reduced the bond-slip curve curvature. The decline of curve was improved by using ECR. Finally, an analytical expression for bond stress-slip curves was proposed. The obtained results provide a basis for the application of reinforced SCAC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available